Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
2.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 86: 102444, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37595337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has few modifiable risk factors. There is evidence that some antihypertensive medicines may have cancer preventive and/or therapeutic actions; therefore, we assessed the associations between use of different antihypertensive medicines and risk of specific EOC histotypes. METHODS: Our nested case-control study of linked administrative health data included 6070 Australian women aged over 50 years diagnosed with EOC from 2004 to 2013, and 30,337 matched controls. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between ever use of each antihypertensive medicine group, including beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and alpha blockers, and the risk of EOC overall and separately for the serous, endometrioid, mucinous, clear cell and other histotypes. RESULTS: We found that most antihypertensive medicines were not associated with risk of EOC. However, women who used calcium channel blockers had a reduced risk of serous EOC (OR= 0.89, 95 % CI:0.81,0.98) and use of combination thiazide and potassium-sparing diuretics was associated with an increased risk of endometroid EOC (OR= 2.09, 95 % CI:1.15,3.82). CONCLUSION: Our results provide little support for a chemo-preventive role for most antihypertensives, however, the histotype-specific associations we found warrant further investigation.

3.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(2): 266-275, 2023 01 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36001852

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) may activate stress-inflammatory responses that stimulate tumor growth and increase metastatic growth. Animal and in vitro studies have shown that inhibition of the catecholamine-induced inflammatory response via beta-adrenergic receptor blockade has antitumor potential in EOC. However, observational studies have reported mixed results. We assessed whether beta-blocker (BB) use at the time of primary ovarian cancer surgery was associated with improved survival in a large population-based study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using linked administrative data, a population-based cohort of 3,844 Australian women age 50 years or older with a history of cardiovascular conditions who underwent surgery for EOC was followed for survival outcomes. The average treatment effect of selective BB (SBB) and nonselective BB (NSBB) supply at the time of surgery on survival was estimated from a causal inference perspective using covariate-balanced inverse probability of treatment weights with flexible parametric survival models that allowed for time-varying survival effects. RESULTS: Around the time of surgery, 560 (14.5%) women were supplied a SBB and 67 (1.7%) were supplied a NSBB. At 2 years postsurgery, the survival proportion was 80% (95% CI, 68 to 88) for women dispensed NSBBs at surgery compared with 69% (95% CI, 67 to 70) for women not supplied NSBBs. The survival advantage appeared to extend to at least 8 years postsurgery. No association was observed for women dispensed a SBB around the time of surgery. CONCLUSION: Perioperative supply of NSBBs appeared to confer a survival advantage for women age over 50 years with a history of cardiovascular conditions. Long-term clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/cirurgia , Austrália , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/cirurgia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia
5.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 114(6): 878-884, 2022 06 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35262727

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are few readily modifiable risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer; preclinical studies suggest bisphosphonates could have chemopreventive actions. Our study aimed to assess the association between use of nitrogen-based bisphosphonate medicine and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer, overall and by histotype. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study nested within a large, linked administrative dataset including all Australian women enrolled for Medicare, Australia's universal health insurance scheme, between July 2002 and December 2013. We included all women with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed at age 50 years and older between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013 (n = 9367) and randomly selected up to 5 controls per case, individually matched to cases by age, state of residence, area-level socioeconomic status, and remoteness of residence category (n = 46 830). We used prescription records to ascertain use of nitrogen-based bisphosphonates (ever use and duration of use), raloxifene, and other osteoporosis medicines (no nitrogen-based bisphosphonates, strontium and denosumab). We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Ever use of nitrogen-based bisphosphonates was associated with a reduced risk of epithelial ovarian cancer compared with no use (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.88). There was a reduced risk of endometrioid (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.79) and serous histotypes (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.93) but no association with the mucinous or clear cell histotypes. CONCLUSION: Use of nitrogen-based bisphosphonates was associated with a reduced risk of endometrioid and serous ovarian cancer. This suggests the potential for use for prevention, although validation of our findings is required.


Assuntos
Difosfonatos , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/complicações , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Nitrogênio , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco
6.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(5): 904-911, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33619026

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the associations between hysterectomy for benign indications and risk of breast, colorectal, kidney, and thyroid cancer, and to explore whether these associations are modified by removal of ovaries at the time of surgery or by age at surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the female population of Western Australia (n = 839,332) linking data from electoral, hospital, births, deaths, and cancer records. We used Cox regression to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between hysterectomy and diagnosis of breast, colorectal, kidney, and thyroid cancers. RESULTS: Compared with no surgery, hysterectomy without oophorectomy (hysterectomy) and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (hysterectomy-BSO) were associated with higher risk of kidney cancer (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11-1.56 and HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.96-1.73, respectively). Hysterectomy, but not hysterectomy-BSO, was related to higher risk of thyroid cancer (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.19-1.60). In contrast, hysterectomy (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98) and hysterectomy-BSO (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00) were associated with lower risk of breast cancer. We found no association between hysterectomy status and colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The associations between hysterectomy and cancer varied by cancer type with increased risks for thyroid and kidney cancer, decreased risk for breast cancer, and no association for colorectal cancer. IMPACT: As breast, colorectal, and gynecologic cancers comprise a sizeable proportion of all cancers in women, our results suggest that hysterectomy is unlikely to increase overall cancer risk; however, further research to understand the higher risk of thyroid and kidney cancer is warranted.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Austrália Ocidental/epidemiologia
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 223(5): 723.e1-723.e16, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376318

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed gynecologic surgeries, with an estimated 30% of women in Australia undergoing the procedure by age of 70 years. In the United States, about 45% of women undergo hysterectomy in their lifetime. Some studies have suggested that this procedure increases the risk of premature mortality. With many women making the decision to undergo hysterectomy for a benign indication each year, additional research is needed to clarify whether there are long-term health consequences of hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between hysterectomy for benign indications, with or without removal of the ovaries, and cause-specific and all-cause mortality. STUDY DESIGN: Our cohort of 666,588 women comprised the female population of Western Australia with linked hospital and health records from 1970 to 2015. Cox regression models were used to assess the association between hysterectomy and all-cause, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other mortality by oophorectomy type (categorized as none, unilateral, and bilateral), with no hysterectomy or oophorectomy as the reference group. We repeated these analyses using hysterectomy without oophorectomy as the reference group. We also investigated whether associations varied by age at the time of surgery, although small sample size precluded this analysis in women who underwent hysterectomy with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. In our main analysis, women who underwent hysterectomy or oophorectomy as part of cancer treatment were retained in the analysis and considered unexposed to that surgery. For a sensitivity analysis, we censored procedures performed for cancer. RESULTS: Compared with no surgery, hysterectomy without oophorectomy before 35 years was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.40); for surgery after 35 years of age, there was an inverse association (35-44 years: hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.97). Similarly, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before 45 years of age was associated with increased all-cause mortality (35-44 years: hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.27), but decreased mortality rates after 45 years of age. In our sensitivity analysis, censoring gynecologic surgeries for cancer resulted in many cancer-related deaths being excluded for women who did not have surgery for benign indications and thus increased the hazard ratios for the associations between both hysterectomy without oophorectomy and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and risk of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. The sensitivity analysis therefore potentially biased the results in favor of no surgery. CONCLUSION: Among women having surgery for benign indications, hysterectomy without oophorectomy performed before 35 years of age and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed before 45 years of age were associated with an increase in all-cause mortality. These procedures are not associated with poorer long-term survival when performed at older ages.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Mortalidade , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Salpingo-Ooforectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Austrália Ocidental , Adulto Jovem
8.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry ; 53(6): 550-558, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30501394

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: People with severe mental illness have similar cancer incidence, but higher mortality than the general population. Participation in cancer screening may be a contributing factor but existing studies are conflicting. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of colorectal, prostate and cervical cancer screening among people with and without severe mental illness in Australia, who have access to universal health care. METHODS: We followed three cohorts using de-identified data from a random 10% sample of people registered for Australia's universal health care system: those aged 50-69 years ( n = 760,058) for colorectal cancer screening; women aged 18-69 years ( n = 918,140) for cervical cancer screening and men aged 50-69 years ( n = 380,238) for prostate cancer screening. We used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between severe mental illness and rates of faecal occult blood testing, pap smears and prostate-specific antigen testing. RESULTS: Having severe mental illness was associated with a 17% reduction in rates of pap smear (incidence rate ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.84) and prostate-specific antigen testing (incidence rate ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.85), compared to the general population. By contrast, incidence rates of faecal occult blood testing were only lower in people with severe mental illness among the participants who visited their general practitioner less than an average of five times per year (incidence rate ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval = [0.73, 0.94]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that differences in screening frequency may explain some of the mismatch between cancer incidence and mortality in people with severe mental illness and indicate that action is required to improve preventive screening in this very disadvantaged group.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sangue Oculto , Teste de Papanicolaou/estatística & dados numéricos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA